Gather round, travellers of law and legend, for this is the heart of the tale â the glowing pearl inside the ginger beer bottle, the rule that rippled out from Paisley to the whole wide world. Aye, this is the Duty of Care, and I, the humble (yet undeniably majestic) Paisley Snail, shall be your guide.
Imagine the world as a great, tangled garden. People bustle about with bottles, bicycles, bannocks, and bold ideas. And in that garden, every one of us â from cafĂ© owners to ginger beer makers to unsuspecting snails â must take a wee bit of care not to harm our neighbours.
Not just the folk next door.
Not just your pals.
But anyone who might be affected by what you do.
Thatâs the magic of it.
Thatâs the myth.
Thatâs the law.
To know whether you owe someone a duty of care, ask yourself:
âCould my actions foreseeably hurt someone who isnât me?â
If the answer is âAye, probably,â then congratulations â youâve just discovered your duty.
This is what Lord Atkin called the Neighbour Principle, though he never once mentioned snails, which I consider a missed opportunity.
(As found in the ancient recipe book beneath the Wellmeadow Café)
1. Duty of Care
You must take reasonable care not to harm your neighbour.
(Reasonable = donât put snails in bottles.)
2. Breach of Duty
You failed to take that care.
(For example: leaving a snail to marinate in gingerâbeer.)
3. Causation
Your breach caused the harm.
(Snail â Bottle â May Donoghue â Hospital.)
4. Damage
Real harm happened.
(Physical, emotional, or the sheer shock of unexpected gastropods.)
Mix all four together and youâve baked yourself a negligence claim.
A man developed dermatitis from sulphiteâcontaminated underwear.
The Privy Council applied Donoghue v Stevenson and held that both the retailer and manufacturer owed a duty of care.
(Who wouldnât wear new underwear straight away?)
A man dived into a harbour at night and hit an underwater obstruction.
The court held there was no duty of care â he voluntarily assumed the risk.
(He didnât try it twice.)
A couple had an unwanted child after a failed vasectomy.
The House of Lords held there was a duty of care â but only for pregnancyârelated costs, not the cost of raising the child.
(Or paying for law school.)
Teachers: Download worksheets and activities on the Duty of Care here.